Charleston, WV
Renewables Law Blog
(By Robert Stonestreet)
Democratic Senators from West Virginia (Joe Manchin) and Michigan (Debbie Stabenow) have introduced legislation to make billions of dollars available to promote manufacturing related to energy efficiency and renewable energy. According to a press release, the proposed “American Jobs in Energy Manufacturing Act of 2021” would provide up to $8 billion in tax credits to “manufacturers and other industrial users to retool, expand, or build new facilities that make or recycle energy-related products.” Half of those credits are designated for communities adversely affected by closures of coal mines or power plants that have not previously received similar tax credits. Under the proposed bill, credits are available for new construction or retrofitting of existing facilities to produce or recycle a range of energy products including:
- advance electric grid, energy storage, and fuel cell equipment;
- equipment for production of low-carbon, low emission fuels, chemicals and other products;
- renewable energy and energy efficiency equipment;
- products or technologies that capture, remove, use, or store carbon dioxide; and
- advanced vehicles, components, and related infrastructure.
The bill is intended to promote creation of domestic jobs that draw on skills possessed by individuals formerly employed in manufacturing, coal mining, or power plant operation. The bill also seeks to promote investment in communities experiencing high unemployment due to coal mine or power plant closures.
Tags: energy, Energy Manufacturing Act of 2021, Manufacturing, tax credits
On February 17, 2021, the Biden Administration announced it will
On February 11, 2021, FERC Chairman Richard Glick discussed plans to develop new incentives to support the buildout of transmission infrastructure to meet the ever-growing demand for electricity and the continued growth of renewable projects across the country. As states issue long term net-zero and renewable energy policy goals, and in turn incentivize development of additional power generation facilities, upgrades and construction of new transmission infrastructure will be needed to carry forth that driving force. Chairman Glick provided that “We do have a duty to figure out where the industry is going and recognize the fact that there is going to be a lot more demand for electricity.” “I think we have to figure out policies that will hopefully promote greater investment in the transmission grid to facilitate access to cleaner resources.” For additional information on Chairman Glick’s policy forecast, please click
A recently settled enforcement action against a solar project developer in Massachusetts underscores the importance of adhering to appropriate stormwater pollution prevention protocols when siting, designing and constructing a project. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts sued the project developer under state and federal environmental laws, alleging that they had constructed a solar array on a hillside parcel without designing or implementing the required stormwater controls. Specifically, the Commonwealth alleged that the developer never properly analyzed the potential for harm from stormwater discharges resulting from construction of the solar array, failed to install necessary stormwater controls prior to conducting site clearing and grading activities, applied for a General Stormwater Permit for construction activities (Permit) without having first prepared a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and ultimately failed to comply with requirements of the Permit and SWPPP that are designed to prevent stormwater pollution. As a result, the Commonwealth claimed, there was an extensive discharge of sediment-laden stormwater over several months into a downgradient river that adversely affected the river’s water quality, and also eroded the hillside, scoured out perennial and intermittent streams, uprooted trees, destroyed streambeds, and filled in wetlands with sediment. The developer has agreed to pay more than $1 million to settle the claim, which includes the cost of restoring impacted natural resources, compensatory mitigation costs, the Commonwealth’s legal fees, and a $100,000 civil penalty.